Return-path: Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:64367 "EHLO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752006AbYI1VMh (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:12:37 -0400 From: Peter Chant To: "Nick Kossifidis" Subject: Re: SMC wireless card, unknown Atheros/Accton chipset? Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:16:46 +0100 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200809281734.01027.pete@petezilla.co.uk> <40f31dec0809281018l6a2fdacwf03ddf0f2876c1a2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <40f31dec0809281018l6a2fdacwf03ddf0f2876c1a2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200809282216.46416.pete@petezilla.co.uk> (sfid-20080928_231249_336788_809037F2) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 28 September 2008, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > It's a 2417, i've already posted a patch that adds support for this > but didn't make it on wireless-testing yet. > > I'll post some new patches ASAP ;-) Thanks. I ususally stay a nice distance away from the bleeding edge, I'll have to investigate. I'm a bit of a wireless newbie. Do you mind me asking whether it is likely to support being an access point? I noticed that in general cards don't work as access points, is it a chipset limitation or is it just a whole load of work for something that is not much in demand? I think I'll sidestep the access point issue by getting a wireless router. Thanks again, Pete -- Peter Chant http://www.petezilla.co.uk