Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:52840 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751888AbYICNPb (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:15:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:04:40 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Kalle Valo , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: at76_usb.[ch] gone fishing from wireless-testing ? Message-ID: <20080903130439.GJ3050@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080903_151535_796206_8150204D) References: <43e72e890809021953o29c6ba53wcdf7630d4ff10b30@mail.gmail.com> <87vdxedje8.fsf@nokia.com> <43e72e890809022003gfd462d2ma8d68f032754c121@mail.gmail.com> <20080903125352.GI3050@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080903125352.GI3050@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:53:52AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:03:32PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > Luis R. Rodriguez writes: > > > > > >> A few times now I've git-fetch'd origin and noticed at76_usb.[ch] > > >> missing on origin/master. Strange, wondering if you're aware of any > > >> such type of issues or its just me. > > > > > > Good point, I don't see it either. But at76_usb is quite broken > > > currently, so maybe John decided just to drop it? Good choice, at > > > least for now. > > > > > > And it's not just that, also -wl suffix is missing from the version. > > > > > > My HEAD is currently: > > > > > > commit 18c8adeb0244f823ba78a51e23f813fe68bc3c54 > > > Author: Michael Buesch > > > Date: Thu Aug 28 19:33:40 2008 +0200 > > > > > > b43: Rewrite TX power adjustment > > > > I'm at: > > > > commit 908dd0b965e64fcc2eb64152bac65f2876c34e0b > > Author: Senthil Balasubramanian > > Date: Mon Sep 1 19:58:20 2008 +0530 > > ath9: Fix ath_rx_flush_tid() for IRQs disabled kernel warning message. > > > > Reason I find it strange is on one box it went through and I still see > > history for it, and in another I don't. I was going to do a fresh pull > > to test but figure I rather ask as bandwidth is crummy at work. > > Crap, I botched my lastest update. I'll pull in the part that adds > -wl to the version for sure. Anyone want to talk me out of pulling-in > the at76 parts? Hmmm...upon further review, both my local copy and the one at kernel.org seem to have the proper bits AFAICT...? -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com