Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:39960 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751556AbYIGOYk (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2008 10:24:40 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1179103fgg.17 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809070724n362d5850t653ca5746b87eb48@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080907_162445_422946_850CF724) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 17:24:38 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mac80211 dissasociation Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1220794765.31304.8.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1220739259-16918-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1220794765.31304.8.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 01:14 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> This series should fix mac problems in disassociation >> There are two basic problems disassociation in current implementation. >> The order of steps in the dissociation flow and missing proper >> disassociation when moving from one AP to another. > > Mind if I adopt this patch series? I've done only slight modifications > so far (the int->bool thing I asked for) and have rebased all the > patches I had already posted on top of it. The arguments to > ieee80211_set_disassoc are changing a lot in my patch series anyway so > I'll just work on top of the bool/bool thing and then fix it up, ok? Don't mind just need to test them properly and update commit messages. Any suggestion how we do that? Tomas