Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:57398 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752266AbYIQOPD (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:15:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:23:07 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Larry Finger Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Matthew Garrett , Carlos Corbacho , Adel Gadllah , wireless , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, Michael Buesch , LKML Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rcX caused by commit bc19d6e0b74ef03a3baf035412c95192b54dfc6f Message-ID: <20080917132305.GA5407@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080917_161509_681961_314FC829) References: <48CFC03A.8020708@lwfinger.net> <200809161742.15527.mb@bu3sch.de> <48CFE820.7010305@lwfinger.net> <200809162018.28548.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <48D0095B.40403@lwfinger.net> <20080916233240.GA18574@srcf.ucam.org> <20080917023334.GA1187@khazad-dum.debian.net> <48D070DC.80007@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <48D070DC.80007@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:52:12PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > I admit that I never tested any of the RFKILL patches as they went in. > One of the reasons is that the development process seemed rather > untidy to an outsider, and I wasn't sure that any of the code would > ever be in the kernel. As such, it snuck up on me. I'll not let that > happen again. After the reversion, I will again test any suggested > code changes, but do not expect me to work out any of the changes. I > have enough to do. FWIW, Henrique has been very persistant with driving rfkill. He has posted and reposted his patch series many times. I'm sorry that it snuck-up on you but it was on the list for quite a while. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com