Return-path: Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.177]:24817 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753119AbYIVVSt (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:18:49 -0400 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so996130ika.5 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) To: Mattias Nissler Subject: Re: what is the states of rt2800 driver? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:18:44 +0200 Cc: "Xu, Martin" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Selbak, Rolla N" References: <200808272222.53719.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200809221937.35900.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1222117314.4670.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1222117314.4670.10.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200809222318.44222.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20080922_231852_829710_365A0013) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 22 September 2008, Mattias Nissler wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 19:37 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Monday 22 September 2008, Xu, Martin wrote: > > > Hi: > > > I am the engineer from intel, and we are working on Moblin project( > > > www.moblin.org). Now we work on eeepc901 platform. The rt2860 wireless > > > device is used by the platform. We hope the device driver can be > > > supported in the kernel mainline. > > > Could you please tell me the states of the device driver? Do you have > > > schedule on it? > > > > Nothing has changed since my last announcement to the linux-wireless list > > regarding the rt2800 drivers. > > That means that the drivers are not ready, and I have abandonded all schedules > > which could indicate when the first test version of the driver can be released. > > > > Mattias Nissler has joined the rt2800 development party, so I really hope > > he has some fresh ideas an how to get the driver development forward again. > > Indeed, I started poking around today. Ivo, do you have version of the > legacy rt2870 usb driver that compiles and works on recent development > kernels? I only managed to compile it on 2.6.25 (but haven't tried hard to get it working for 2.6.26 and higher), is that recent enough? Ivo