Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:56366 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752224AbYIFSL7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:11:59 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: gavron@wetwork.net Subject: Re: Speed enhancement for BCM4306/2 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 20:11:35 +0200 Cc: Larry Finger , Broadcom Wireless , wireless References: <48C1BA91.7050106@lwfinger.net> <48C2A1F5.6020607@lwfinger.net> <48C2C6D3.3030601@wetwork.net> In-Reply-To: <48C2C6D3.3030601@wetwork.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200809062011.35637.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20080906_201202_762655_42271BDA) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:07:15 gavron@wetwork.net wrote: > correct these issues. I did see several other ways in which the code > does not match the specs. Should that be documented in the code or > should the code be conformed to the specs even if that ends up breaking > the driver? You're really considering breaking the driver just to conform the specs? > Without getting into specifics it's cases where the specs will say "When > something=value" but the code says "when variable >=(value -1)". Please show us the code, so we can give you advise. -- Greetings Michael.