Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:33516 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754039AbYIQQnw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:43:52 -0400 Subject: Re: iw packaging From: Johannes Berg To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1221668590.6782.10.camel@californication> References: <1221596962.9262.12.camel@johannes.berg> <1221668590.6782.10.camel@californication> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:43:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1221669826.3217.1.camel@localhost> (sfid-20080917_184356_807082_BBB4BA6D) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marcel, > > I've just tagged iw version 0.9 (and 0.9.1 after a small build fix) > > because I think the tool is now actually usable in a limited way, unlike > > before where it would never properly report errors etc. > > do you have a kernel.org account? If yes, it would be nice if you can > create tarballs and put them there. If not, I can do it for you if you > want me to. No, I don't, though I guess I could get one if I asked. So far I haven't really seen a need for tarballs since gitweb creates them so easily :) Do you think it'd be worthwhile? I can probably automate that easily on wireless.kernel.org... johannes