Subject: Re: prism54 stopped working after upgrade from kernel
	2.6.25.14-69.fc8 to 2.6.26.3-14.fc8
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
Cc: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200809222332.00500.chunkeey@web.de>
References: <CB9B2237C21D46F3B852E45F75E91C52@soleil>
	 <200809222205.28754.chunkeey@web.de>
	 <1221944909.11865.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200809222332.00500.chunkeey@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:44:29 -0400
Message-Id: <1221947069.11865.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20080922_234435_173388_4B58C0A8)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:32 +0200, Chr wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 23:08:29 Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 22:05 +0200, Chr wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 September 2008 20:38:04 Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> > > > With the new kernel 2.6.26.3-14.fc8, I see that the prism54 card looks
> > > > in a correct working mode (e.g. /sbin/iwlist wlan0 scan shows good scan
> > > > results).
> > > > But after that, wpa_supplicant cannot associate (gets a timeout)
> > > > (while it works ok with 2.6.25.14-69.fc8)
> > > > I have put below the output of wpa_supplicant for the bad case
> > > > and for the good case.
> > > >
> > > > What can I do to further see what is going wrong ?
> > >
> > > Well, you can blame the fedora people if you want.
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit
> > >;h=aaa1553512b9105699113ea7e2ea726f3d9d4de2
> >
> > Is that commit not in stable 2.6.26 yet or something?
> Hmm, no? AFAIK The mac80211 multiqueue changes went in somewhere in the 
> 2.6.27-rc cycle. so 2.6.26.stable doesn't need any extra patches, right?

Ah yeah right; I guess I don't understand the link you posted then.  I'd
thought it was something like "you need this patch which Fedora doesn't
have in their kernel".

Dan