Return-path: Received: from foo.birdnet.se ([213.88.146.6]:38422 "HELO foo.birdnet.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750935AbYI3Fui (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:50:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20080930055034.16412.qmail@stuge.se> (sfid-20080930_075043_273785_E3591D62) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:50:34 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: wireless , Broadcom Linux Subject: Re: [RFC/T] b43: to few loop tries in do_dummy_tx References: <48E11F1E.50705@lwfinger.net> <200809292038.37939.mb@bu3sch.de> <20080929211620.6344.qmail@stuge.se> <48E14879.4050300@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <48E14879.4050300@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger wrote: > > Which specs? > > The ones generated by the reverse engineers. See > http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/. Nice work, but as it's a spec of another driver implementation rather than hardware (or even the firmware API) I don't think it should be so authoritative. If other values are clearly better why not use them? //Peter