Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:63267 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752270AbYIZILz (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:11:55 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so569549fgg.17 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809260111i217ff844q73036685e6d74aee@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080926_101201_039059_657F7B4B) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:11:53 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Kernel panic in wireless-testing-2008-09-24 with rtl8187 Cc: "Larry Finger" , "Johannes Berg" , "Hauke Mehrtens" , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <43e72e890809260043n1b31dea9yaad2e7a2d80ed819@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <48DBE5E8.2000507@hauke-m.de> <48DC0008.2070802@lwfinger.net> <1ba2fa240809251436j500e1435ldf165b43451aa628@mail.gmail.com> <48DC51AF.6000900@lwfinger.net> <43e72e890809260006kfc833fdsccbe3f22b3ad4c56@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890809260043n1b31dea9yaad2e7a2d80ed819@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Larry Finger wrote: >>> Tomas Winkler wrote: >>>> wild guess try to revert: >>>> 'mac80211: make master iface not wireless' >>> >>> You win the prize. Bisection shows that >>> 84b0ba8ed0423a3c56a28e701b735daae3e15766 is first bad commit >>> >>> commit 84b0ba8ed0423a3c56a28e701b735daae3e15766 >>> Author: Johannes Berg >>> Date: Tue Sep 16 14:18:59 2008 +0200 >>> >>> mac80211: make master iface not wireless >>> >>> >>> The actual crash is in the following routine from include/net/wireless.h: >>> >>> /** >>> * wiphy_priv - return priv from wiphy >>> */ >>> static inline void *wiphy_priv(struct wiphy *wiphy) >>> { >>> BUG_ON(!wiphy); >>> return &wiphy->priv; >>> } >>> >>> I'm still looking to see where it goes wrong. >> >> Actually wouldn't you get a stack trace here? > > Yeah not sure I tested against !wiphy on its callers and didn't find a > case where it hit. I don't think this is it. u16 ieee80211_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data; struct ieee80211_local *local = wdev_priv(dev->ieee80211_ptr); --- this is the line Tomas