Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:52571 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752373AbYIPAJk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:09:40 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so26255819gxk.13 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43e72e890809151709k7a2fc3bei6e420db7765063a4@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080916_020944_306621_F6F62FBB) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:09:39 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Tomas Winkler" Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: re-enable aggregation on 2.6.27 Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240809151705k5b868c88j9151f04e485b542a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <1221503192-28502-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <43e72e890809151555u3a79bd89h763fa0a6ba07e752@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890809151624g3540f308r90808e281b22314e@mail.gmail.com> <1ba2fa240809151705k5b868c88j9151f04e485b542a@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> wrote: >> >> With iwlagn (Intel 4965) on HT40 5GHz using iperf over TCP I get much >> more convincing results (still noisy environment): >> >> mcgrof@pogo ~ $ iperf -s -i1 >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Server listening on TCP port 5001 >> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 4] local 192.168.1.5 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.3 port 41403 >> [ 4] 0.0- 1.0 sec 3.61 MBytes 30.3 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 1.0- 2.0 sec 1.88 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 2.0- 3.0 sec 7.56 MBytes 63.4 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 3.0- 4.0 sec 11.4 MBytes 96.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 4.0- 5.0 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.3 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 5.0- 6.0 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 6.0- 7.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 7.0- 8.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 88.9 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 8.0- 9.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 9.0-10.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 88.6 MBytes 73.1 Mbits/sec >> > Are you sure there is aggregation on the air? In 40Mhz with > aggregation we should be at least 110Mbit or better something around > 150Mbits. This looks like HT rates but no aggregation. I'll ask wireshark. Luis