Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.80.65]:35402 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752454AbYIUWIK (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:08:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:07:08 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Denys Fedoryshchenko Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Johannes Berg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart. Message-ID: <20080921220708.GA31413@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20080921182835.GA11473@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080921140203.4698a2ee@infradead.org> <20080921210554.GA2135@2ka.mipt.ru> <200809220043.07345.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200809220043.07345.denys@visp.net.lb> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:43:07AM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko (denys@visp.net.lb) wrote: > You are not right. I had totaly disfunctional Intel driver on two laptops and > reported about issue to Intel. Yes it took time, they took all debugs and > went coma mode (i was thinking that), but suddently i got mail from them, and > next kernel/firmware release worked for me flawlessly. So they did perfect > job. I'm talking about current situation. > Don't be negative and prepare yourself for giving long debug outputs. Patience > and only patience. Just to be clear, did it take 4 years? :) Anyway, I already made conclusions, as probably others: I will experiment with different 'workarounds' for this bug, maybe I will succeed, maybe Intel will decided to fix it, maybe LHC will crash the world. Verbose warning about the bug was frowned upon, so its up to uses to make a progress here... -- Evgeniy Polyakov