Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:46135 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757358AbYJ3RK5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:10:57 -0400 From: Chr To: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: don't report known but unhandled EEPROM codes as unknown Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:10:45 +0100 Cc: John W Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20081029213143.4497.77258.stgit@dv.roinet.com> In-Reply-To: <20081029213143.4497.77258.stgit@dv.roinet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200810301810.45647.chunkeey@web.de> (sfid-20081030_181132_805053_E7B8EBEF) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 29 October 2008 22:31:43 Pavel Roskin wrote: > [...] > + case PDR_RADIATED_TRANSMISSION_CORRECTION: > + case PDR_PRISM_TX_IQ_CALIBRATION: > + case PDR_BASEBAND_REGISTERS: > + case PDR_PER_CHANNEL_BASEBAND_REGISTERS: > + break; > default: > printk(KERN_INFO "p54: unknown eeprom code : 0x%x\n", > le16_to_cpu(entry->code)); what about removing the printk? since intersil reserved 0x8000-0xffff for it's customers... so there could be lots of unknown pdr magics. Regards, Chr