Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.233]:50877 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753285AbYJNHEZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:04:25 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1293774wri.5 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43e72e890810140004k6bfa72edsf39acbafcf317fa6@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081014_090428_379731_98F7F4D1) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:04:23 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Zhu Yi" Subject: Re: New Regulatory Domain Api. Cc: "Kolekar, Abhijeet" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <1223967581.2570.144.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <20081009154547.GB13349@tesla> <1223608949.2510.1061.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <43e72e890810100949i78c1d813x1b66c6bc0239ef28@mail.gmail.com> <1223967581.2570.144.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Zhu Yi wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:49 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> The real correct behavior here, as the comment also >> indicates, is we should be doing an intersection between the two >> regulatory domains and I sent a RFC on a some initial code I had to >> support such intersection. Until that is not merged we just respect >> first regulatory request. > > Why should the intersection be the correct behavior? In my previous > example, the intersection of a BG card and an ABG card is the BG bands. > Why shouldn't the ABG card have the A band support? Intersection of ABG and BG is BG. Luis