Return-path: Received: from basicbox7.server-home.net ([195.137.212.29]:46507 "EHLO basicbox7.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751690AbYJ1Hfp (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:35:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4906B944.4010105@leemhuis.info> (sfid-20081028_083550_035307_58424396) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:03:32 +0100 From: Thorsten Leemhuis MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rtl2860 driver in mainline? References: <20081028004915.GA3442@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20081028004915.GA3442@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28.10.2008 01:49, Greg KH wrote: > So, on my quest to suck up every out-of-tree driver and get it into the > main kernel tree (drivers/staging/ to start with), I've been pointed at > the rtl2860 driver. Does it really make sense to include a driver when a different one for mainline inclusion is being actively developed? It might give some developers the impression that it's worth spending time improving the rtl2860/2870 drivers -- which might be wasted time in the end. > Does anyone know of a "cleaned up" version of this driver that is > newer/better than the one on ralink's web site? I found the > 2008_0918_RT2860_Linux_STA_v1.8.0.0.tar.bz2 version there, and will > start with that if no one else has yet. > > Any pointers are appreciated. You can find a few patches (needed for 2.6.26 and 2.6.27 iirc; not sure if they are enough to make it work on current mainline) for both rt2860 and rt2870 in CVS for RPM Fusion: http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/rt2860-kmod/devel/?root=free http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/rt2870-kmod/devel/?root=free HTH CU knurd