Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:59718 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754057AbYJEPQp (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:16:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:14:52 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kalle Valo Cc: proski@gnu.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status Message-ID: <20081005151452.GC20764@kroah.com> (sfid-20081005_171651_617328_73552EA9) References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> <87y713y48r.fsf@nokia.com> <20081005061603.GB28533@kroah.com> <87d4ifsgg5.fsf@litku.valot.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87d4ifsgg5.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 09:29:14AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > >> > So I was wondering what the status of this driver is, and if I > >> > could/should add it to drivers/staging/? > >> > >> The original at76_usb is working quite well, but it's unacceptable for > >> the mainline because we cannot have two 802.11 stacks in kernel. > > > > I understand this, but for the issue of the drivers/staging/ tree, it's > > ok for us to have as many 802.11 stacks in the kernel as we can cram in > > there :) > > That's good. > > > See my previous posts on lkml for details on the staging tree if you > > have questions about it. > > > > So for now, if no one really screams, I'll put Pavel's driver into the > > drivers/staging/ tree so that users can use their devices. When your > > driver is merged, we can merely delete this driver instead. > > > > Sound good? > > That sounds very good. User's benefit from this and that's what > counts. > > BTW, Pavel doesn't have time for at76 anymore. So if you have any > problems with Pavel's driver in the stating tree, I can help you. Thanks for the offer, hopefully I'll not have to take you up on it. greg k-h