Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:55893 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753167AbYJBXVI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:21:08 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:21:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:20:54 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Greg KH CC: "proski@gnu.org" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status Message-ID: <20081002162054.GI5960@tesla> (sfid-20081003_012114_342344_F2FC7E50) References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:07:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Hi, > > In my quest to suck drivers into drivers/staging/ I noticed that the > at76_usb driver is being shipped by both Fedora and Ubuntu in their > kernels. > > So I was wondering what the status of this driver is, and if I > could/should add it to drivers/staging/? If it's about to go into > 2.6.28 then I'll hold off, but it would be nice to know what the status > is. > > Also, it looks like it is being developed in a git tree, where is that > tree? > > And, did you merge the USB DFU code into the driver itself? Having that > kind of functionality in the USB core is fine with me if you want me to > add that portion there, no reason it needs to be burried in individual > drivers. Also, it may help to keep this status here, once we find out what it is: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/at76_usb Luis