Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:56918 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755107AbYJPX1g (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:27:36 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so434820gxk.13 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43e72e890810161627vaa0d8ebq1ca2d2428e3fffa8@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081017_012740_076116_4F061295) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:27:34 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Christian Lamparter" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: AP & Ad-hoc testing Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W Linville" , "Larry Finger" , "Johannes Berg" , "Pavel Roskin" In-Reply-To: <200810170117.07236.chunkeey@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <200810170117.07236.chunkeey@web.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > With this patch one can finally test Ad-hoc & AP mode. > The station unlocking should work now, so the card doesn't have > to be rebooted anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter Nice, BTW besides ad-hoc what other stuff does prism54 support that p54 doesn't? Also have you had any reports of users not being able to use p54 over prism54? I ask because I'd like to rm -rf prism54, specially if no distribution is carrying it around anymore and if it has no users. Other considerations against removing it before was that p54 wasn't feature paired with prism54. I am wondering if this is still the case. Luis