Return-path: Received: from hostap.isc.org ([149.20.54.63]:35215 "EHLO hostap.isc.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbYJVRFs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:05:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:04:44 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Larry Finger Cc: Jouni Malinen , wireless , LKML , John Linville Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-git from commit 43ac2ca3840f64 Message-ID: <20081022170444.GH16005@jm.kir.nu> (sfid-20081022_190553_248049_6328EF1C) References: <48FDFCCA.8040604@lwfinger.net> <20081022072840.GD16005@jm.kir.nu> <48FF5933.3080501@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <48FF5933.3080501@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:47:47AM -0700, Larry Finger wrote: > When a utility starts spitting messages that it doesn't understand what the > kernel is providing _AND_ the commit message does not mention that this will > happen, can someone be blamed for thinking it is a bug? But the utility here understands that it receives additional IEs; it just does not know the name or format for them. I do not understand why the commit message should have commented on any particular user space tool and their behavior as long as nothing is broken (and as far as I'm aware, nothing was broken by that change). > Clearly this is not a regression. Are there plans to update the wireless utilities? Update them (or well, iwlist) to do what? Sure, it could have a list of some additional known SSIDs, but that does not sound very useful. If the "IE: Unknown" part is really making this somehow horrible for users, I would just hide those lines by default (but there should be an option to enable them). Anyway, I do not have any plans on providing a patch to change iwlist behavior because I think the current behavior is desirable. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA