Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:59824 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbYJFSU7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:20:59 -0400 Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status From: Marcel Holtmann To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Dan Williams , Greg KH , Kalle Valo , "proski@gnu.org" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20081006102302.GA6288@tesla> References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> <87y713y48r.fsf@nokia.com> <20081005061603.GB28533@kroah.com> <1223306593.31040.33.camel@dhcp-100-3-195.bos.redhat.com> <20081006102302.GA6288@tesla> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:21:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1223317277.11272.222.camel@violet.holtmann.net> (sfid-20081006_202115_189231_C76E137E) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Luis, > > Well, you have to ask yourself then, what's the point of putting that > > driver with it's own 802.11 stack into staging when it's never going to > > go into the mainline kernel until it uses mac80211? > > And provided that there is an alternative driver that uses mac80211. Die > out of tree drivers, die. I can only second that. If it is a SoftMAC and not using mac80211 then it is not even worth it. We want the mac80211 ported driver to go upstream. Everything else is just waste of time. Regards Marcel