Return-path: Received: from emh04.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.110]:40733 "EHLO emh04.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751861AbYJFGKW (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 02:10:22 -0400 To: Pavel Roskin Cc: Greg KH , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> <87y713y48r.fsf@nokia.com> <20081005061603.GB28533@kroah.com> <87d4ifsgg5.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <1223270894.18180.7.camel@dv> <87vdw6mgdl.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <1223271737.18180.15.camel@dv> From: Kalle Valo Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:10:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1223271737.18180.15.camel@dv> (Pavel Roskin's message of "Mon\, 06 Oct 2008 01\:42\:17 -0400") Message-ID: <87r66umeyh.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (sfid-20081006_081032_923590_8A48C3AB) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pavel Roskin writes: >> I agree, it's very confusing. I'll change the name of the mac80211 >> port to something else, most probably to at76c50x-usb. Any comments? >> Anyone? > > I'd rather avoid the old driver completely. But if we want to resurrect > it, its name was "at76c503a". The atmel driver says it supports that also that chipset: config ATMEL tristate "Atmel at76c50x chipset 802.11b support" Hence I would like to have the usb suffix in the name, just to avoid the confusion. -- Kalle Valo