Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:3656 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752257AbYJHMk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:40:26 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so2694599fgg.17 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240810080540m32134461t26096022d11c6dfa@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081008_144030_146591_7C83918E) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:40:24 +0200 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: HT capabilities IE Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1223460098.3618.53.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1223460098.3618.53.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi, > > quick question, I can't seem to read that from the draft, is the HT > capabilities IE supposed to be constant when, say, sent from an AP in > every beacon? Most fields look very constant, but e.g. the SM power save > mode might not be? SM has to be changed using action frame by the spec IIRC Tomas