Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:10395 "EHLO
	mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751197AbYJGGWo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Oct 2008 02:22:44 -0400
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: get rid of IWL_{GET,SET}_BITS crap
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:21:56 +0200
Cc: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"John Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
References: <1223311803.15196.36.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240810061135t24f2dfbv2a5eb0cd5d9e8cd7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240810061135t24f2dfbv2a5eb0cd5d9e8cd7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <200810070821.56462.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20081007_082249_606035_54A78133)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

> I don't want these macros eithers but I NACK any patches with
> cursing in the commit logs.

I fully agree. There's no need to speak about "crap" when 
changing other people's code. In some cultures thats quite 
insulting.