Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:52685 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751582AbYJVJOw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:14:52 -0400 Subject: Re: New iwlwifi 3945 uCode available From: Johannes Berg To: Tomas Winkler Cc: reinette chatre , Marcel Holtmann , "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240810220210w39466f2bobd1d6b32f99b533d@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081022_111008_762585_6640DE21) References: <1224613633.10863.43.camel@rc-desk> <1224624324.28639.9.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240810211433q2e7a13b2p45cb8d38a74393c9@mail.gmail.com> <1224624899.28639.17.camel@johannes.berg> <20081021213814.GM17268@tuxdriver.com> <1ba2fa240810211453y40739183v84999364c89886ee@mail.gmail.com> <1224627187.9386.103.camel@californication> <1224628088.10863.100.camel@rc-desk> <1224660449.28639.22.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240810220210w39466f2bobd1d6b32f99b533d@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081022_111008_762585_6640DE21) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BMKilNTsfWl6xtM4fFxR" Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:14:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1224666883.28639.40.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20081022_111455_906951_30CB3A48) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-BMKilNTsfWl6xtM4fFxR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:10 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > I really don't know why we let you get away with this and bitch > > endlessly when b43 does such a change, to the point where we finally > > cave in and support both versions. Why should a community-supported > > driver be held to higher standards? >=20 > Patches that we'll support both firmwares from the cummutiy will be > welcome, as always. So you're saying we should let you get away with it and just fix it ourselves... How about you identify which patch broke it so we stand a chance? But if then we decide the breakage is worse than the new feature, and revert the patch, you'll scream bloody murder anyway so why do I even bother? Clearly, so far there's no attempt to hold you to the same standards we hold community drivers to, and you are in no way motivated to improve our opinion of you by doing something voluntarily. johannes --=-BMKilNTsfWl6xtM4fFxR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJI/u7/AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYM4MQAKtBDG0XXQfmOzpw9ZsLyQAa L5KfgWjQTwGcEteZpecSJ9ydGOJvBd84hnUJ5qeBaIxb+VDx7W9nyAqZykSqFYtf s5hszqXE1NW1WLTb1pMqibbIgQZAk0PupQ+giLD+DjuMOtaplbgrdKVDBchtPwxx Pk/w8E8sVtDMxWJFk0cQof6KnC4NCWngjPUptBcXrXSVJR1VDLDhmumuN04vqqGQ Oycvm2ssJk1bvZo9cS9+ytfIBsNk8HUZex/mdc1jcHMfVB5LU+T/rD2dT8BTNF5I bwL+KEk0GtKHDJpi0OBOKVDmn3aWlNt0s0Y0yYBOTgWerAYYTp3/d2jkD6dF4FAO yyHeuD1YjanpNjYx+0vNX+xU42/D+/HbCXiLdzVNUUNGk0l+9hNM3xXMbkMg7C8Y hjhMcoOM/IOijvFEAdrPNdRjwAP7B2nlSYTRwp306dAy0+1L0TKO9qgWyDTnW028 WQYau7AFXH34RlkL+2E3SYTyJnx9WP/+4UmmmuTQRKcsvEi91DujLhYby+UmIWFm klM5lYja7jnm28r/VoXegrBfoLSaD9gDx4XM1BskrsLayvLQ5LK2Prm2j3zZe4Z9 qsvoSU2ES8jpdMP9CXtR7+vXL1LvAP4u6cWi2E2LcBXBLBba2ma3N23ZvgW75Svr qTofvzirjCoPRESljkWx =w8eQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BMKilNTsfWl6xtM4fFxR--