Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:41023 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752649AbYJFW6Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:58:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:54:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Johannes Berg , Dan Williams , Kalle Valo , proski@gnu.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status Message-ID: <20081006225406.GA14853@kroah.com> (sfid-20081007_005821_596054_CA9F5120) References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> <87y713y48r.fsf@nokia.com> <20081005061603.GB28533@kroah.com> <1223306593.31040.33.camel@dhcp-100-3-195.bos.redhat.com> <20081006183520.GA17647@kroah.com> <1223323940.31717.3.camel@dhcp-100-3-195.bos.redhat.com> <20081006203118.GG3448@tuxdriver.com> <1223325748.3778.30.camel@johannes.berg> <20081006213909.GN3448@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20081006213909.GN3448@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:39:09PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:42:28PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 16:31 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:12:20PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > I'll gladly drop it from drivers/staging when the "real" version hits > > > > > mainline, until then, it should stay in staging, as that is the whole > > > > > point of it. > > > > > > > > It does nobody any good if (a) the drivers are _never_ going to go > > > > upstream, and (b) if the drivers aren't going to get any attention in > > > > their current form because of (a). > > > > > > > > I don't care if the driver allows peoples hardware to work; I want a > > > > driver that makes peoples hardware work _well_. Out of tree drivers > > > > that are never going upstream will not work well. > > > > > > I think/thought the main point of -staging was to give drivers > > > visibility in hopes of people working to fix them. > > > > Shouldn't then the mac80211-based at76_usb be in -staging instead? That > > one might not work completely, but at least it's fixable without a > > rewrite. > > Yes, probably so. That is what I had planned to send to Greg, but I > was thinking that the version currently in wireless-testing probably > won't compile against -staging (which is based on 2.6.27). No, sorry, I've moved my -staging tree into my "main" kernel development tree which is based on 2.6.27-rc8 right now. So if you have a version that you would rather see instead of the "old" one in drivers/staging/ please feel free to send it to me. thanks, greg k-h