Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:35045 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753935AbYJHKBi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:01:38 -0400 Subject: HT capabilities IE From: Johannes Berg To: linux-wireless Cc: Tomas Winkler Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aXst93nDvOE8YLFIDl3c" Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:01:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1223460098.3618.53.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20081008_120141_864645_4C0DCEA1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-aXst93nDvOE8YLFIDl3c Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, quick question, I can't seem to read that from the draft, is the HT capabilities IE supposed to be constant when, say, sent from an AP in every beacon? Most fields look very constant, but e.g. the SM power save mode might not be? johannes --=-aXst93nDvOE8YLFIDl3c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJI7IT+AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYpTAQAI/Dx+aAL+uSQzGDFF04LOGP WHvaD5T/ldlX98N4lwZeC4x7rrY4irBKQ2KvKT8YdxduwRE2iQFlE5Nb88zXLrOS afRsk+W1Cj37lxufj5SQ5S5MyUzYOq0hfl5BSUjFhnXC+19GtjIiP0fL8xLqgMmJ pcE3tdaRc300cYQMSyako25bgepuEDtDdzfvIBw0364wV+ocUFdBiC7ticVwRTcF Bvy82d2umTj+OF1f2c/yJRv3xMxicErtVltAQ0lxf8bQp7Y1VwdBcvaeDXRVXe2I A0fYCAu5xrh8VWs9eZHofV2myxJaskV0iu3uRvC0uGsoQ7C2MD1FCtXx2VPieCQb d0gY/mPharfMSEXzADM+sCHpFVJlPiTeXqvipSh0LxjEkyV4c8pcdwS88nAQpEX9 q55/s8K2MH8yEMlnQb2D6c60imrduqh+DNiEVm0sCzpJZoNpt6Eow8pUQwW4GWHK VRi76aqKkba5blmUn0fuPayUEmbqwDV70mv+n3ZdWoGFkuu5kurRqClMkuDMZ9HE SzGKPM5UCG1VOLFlKkHM89Xs3m269VS9fDGTLOwfvn031AG7GqVgtEZybJ46QbVr K3AgdEJm9acwB7bVaZIlOcD6x7yJPjZx54SFK/iS8wf+e2VnGOxQ+CnAL0axgjO0 3r57palZTzyAGhS8Y9Th =v9VI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aXst93nDvOE8YLFIDl3c--