Return-path: Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.117]:47466 "EHLO emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751698AbYJEGWh (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2008 02:22:37 -0400 To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Greg KH , proski@gnu.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: at76_usb driver status References: <20081002210742.GA27221@kroah.com> <87y713y48r.fsf@nokia.com> <1223187189.11272.74.camel@violet.holtmann.net> From: Kalle Valo Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:22:29 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1223187189.11272.74.camel@violet.holtmann.net> (Marcel Holtmann's message of "Sun\, 05 Oct 2008 08\:13\:09 +0200") Message-ID: <87hc7rsgre.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (sfid-20081005_082240_690956_641FD6E7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcel Holtmann writes: > Hi Kalle, Hello Marcel, >> I might be interested in getting DFU into USB core, because I would >> like to learn more about USB. But first I need to get at76_usb stable. > > please be careful with this. I have seen so many broken or vendor > enhanced DFU stuff that it might be not a good idea to put it into the > USB core since it would be full of quirks. Heh, I should have guessed this. Thanks for the heads up. > I do have my own dfutool used for firmware flashing and the OpenMoko > project got their own dfu-util. Both in userspace. Thanks, I'll take a look at them. -- Kalle Valo