Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:51923 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750974AbYKCRUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:20:45 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1033418nfc.21 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:20:44 -0800 (PST) To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:20:40 +0100 Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Alan Jenkins References: <1225730537-2679-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200811031747.16326.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20081103170243.GB2417@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20081103170243.GB2417@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200811031820.41165.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20081103_182048_107690_06C085D2) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 03 November 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Monday 03 November 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > This small patchset contains two fixes to issues in the suspend/resume > > > handling of the rfkill class core. > > > > > > It needs to go to 2.6.28. These patches are based on 2.6.28-rc3. > > > > Are they real regressions or normal bugfixes? > > I am not sure if they regress anything, but I am pretty sure there is no > bugzilla entry about them yet. I have added two more interested parties to > the CC. > > So, if there is a strong feeling this would best be held until the next > merge window, I can certainly respin the patches to on top of > wireless-testing... Well I'll give my ACK to the 2 patches, but I'll let john decide if they are "regression" enough for 2.6.28. ;) Ivo