Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:51853 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752736AbYK0PQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:16:15 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so445079eyi.37 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:16:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: (sfid-20081127_161620_456486_061BE40E) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:16:13 +0100 From: "Stefan Steuerwald" To: "Christian Lamparter" Subject: Re: p54: AP mode: no data frame despite traffic indication set in TIM Cc: "Johannes Berg" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200811271542.23390.chunkeey@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <200811242124.16358.chunkeey@web.de> <1227795234.3809.94.camel@johannes.berg> <200811271542.23390.chunkeey@web.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > But I don't know what to do with set-and-clear.diff > (I guess it's still one of the three patches, or?, I've attached it again, > in case johannes missed it? ). > Is it really necessary or does your application work without it? I have done a very quick test of that (exactly what I had before MINUS the set-and-clear.diff). I don't see any problems. I recommend not to include this patch at this time. I am without the hardware until Dec 8, but will continue testing after that. CCMP is on my list (have only done unencrypted stuff yet). Best regards, Stefan.