Message-ID: <1417.92.50.109.198.1227678824.squirrel@webmail.madwifi.org> (sfid-20081126_065355_127204_2D4457A1)
In-Reply-To: <20081126010218.GP5950@tesla>
References: <492B2B74.7040404@gmail.com> <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla>
    <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv>
    <43e72e890811241526o1ea6ecf7ge05a2319d6ff3641@mail.gmail.com>
    <492B623E.5030202@gmail.com> <1227580299.32415.2.camel@dv>
    <20081126001942.GN5950@tesla> <1227659754.2556.11.camel@dv>
    <20081126010218.GP5950@tesla>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:53:44 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality
From: "Michael Renzmann" <mrenzmann@madwifi-project.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: "Pavel Roskin" <proski@gnu.org>,
	"Richard Farina" <sidhayn@gmail.com>,
	"John Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael Green" <michael.green@atheros.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

Hi.

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> When in a DFS freq, if you don't support DFS in your mode of operation,
> then you cannot TX.

Side note: this behaviour is not required in all jurisdictions. German
regulatory body for example allows use of non-DFS-compliant gear even on
(at least some) DFS channels, but only with low TX power. Is that
supported already?

Bye, Mike