Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:61410 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954AbYKXGcz (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:32:55 -0500 Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-11-18 From: Zhu Yi To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: "John W. Linville" , Tomas Winkler , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" In-Reply-To: <7E134DC0-A86D-460A-B5DC-22E6D9BEED92@linux.intel.com> References: <20081119000719.GA19756@tuxdriver.com> <1ba2fa240811182246m17a6baf0ybde19af030a65819@mail.gmail.com> <1ba2fa240811190134u7974a840i532e8ed0e18f8c72@mail.gmail.com> <20081119143919.GA3485@tuxdriver.com> <1227497655.2548.257.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <7E134DC0-A86D-460A-B5DC-22E6D9BEED92@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:33:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1227508394.2548.307.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (sfid-20081124_073305_344630_FC584C11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:50 +0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 > > and just relying on Bugzilla is not gonna be good enough. The Linux > kernel development has always been done via mailing lists. And while > there is a kernel and other Bugzillas, the main authority is still the > mailing list. So if you wanna get massive feedback or have testing > patches for debugging, then these need to be posted to linux-wireless > and not "hidden" into a Bugzilla. This is generally true for bugs easy to debug with. But in this example, the first reporter opened this bug 4 months ago. People usually don't follow thread for such a long time. There are also some reporters never show up in this ML. > I do have a perfect environment in Vancouver that allows me to trigger > this behavior within a few minutes. So if you really wanna debug this, > then just send debug patches to the mailing list and I am happy to run > such kernels. Can you still reproduce this bug with Johannes' patch? Thanks, -yi