Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:37648 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752663AbYKTQPG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:15:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: sysfs was displaying different values for level and noise than procfs From: Pavel Roskin To: Johannes Berg Cc: "John W. Linville" , Andrey Borzenkov , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1227164258.17336.20.camel@johannes.berg> References: <200811151831.26403.arvidjaar@mail.ru> <1227122019.2196.14.camel@dv> <200811192245.29487.arvidjaar@mail.ru> <20081119200856.GH3485@tuxdriver.com> <1227131518.3571.16.camel@dv> (sfid-20081119_225207_085809_144B09A0) <1227164258.17336.20.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:15:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1227197701.10629.1.camel@dv> (sfid-20081120_171511_568385_B0ED8569) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:57 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > Actually, I was hoping to deprecate the sysfs interface, there are tons > of apps relying on procfs unfortunately and very few, if any, relying on > sysfs. OK, then I would not bother changing it at all. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin