Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:2059 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752547AbYKXX0o (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:26:44 -0500 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so964234ywe.1 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:26:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43e72e890811241526o1ea6ecf7ge05a2319d6ff3641@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081125_002647_989818_9C212585) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:26:42 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Pavel Roskin" Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality Cc: "Richard Farina" , "John Linville" , wireless In-Reply-To: <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <492B2B74.7040404@gmail.com> <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla> <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 15:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Your point about not being able to listen is a good one, and a patch to >> update the the US in consideration of part 15 rules would be >> appreciated. Keep in mind we have flags for such things: >> >> -Passive scan >> -No-IBSS >> >> We should probably rename no-ibss to no-beaconing though as that is the >> real meaning inention behind it. > > Maybe you mean no-transmit? Yeah sure, that seems to make more sense. Luis