Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:28445 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbYKZATo (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:19:44 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:19:44 -0800 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:19:42 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Pavel Roskin CC: Richard Farina , Luis Rodriguez , John Linville , wireless Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality Message-ID: <20081126001942.GN5950@tesla> (sfid-20081126_011948_194794_A597BBB8) References: <492B2B74.7040404@gmail.com> <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla> <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv> <43e72e890811241526o1ea6ecf7ge05a2319d6ff3641@mail.gmail.com> <492B623E.5030202@gmail.com> <1227580299.32415.2.camel@dv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1227580299.32415.2.camel@dv> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 06:31:39PM -0800, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:26 -0500, Richard Farina wrote: > > > I'm all for adding it to crda as no-transmit but, is that a valid flag? > > Also, how well does it work? From a monitor mode interface you can > > inject raw packets out of the interface. Would just adding > > "no-transmit" into the crda line work? I certainly don't see this in > > the crda code anywhere, nor in the definition of regdb file. I presume > > this has to be added? > > I don't know anything about the process for introducing new CRDA flags. This is documented here: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Changingthedatabasefileformat Luis