Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:36109 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752549AbYKZAf4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:35:56 -0500 Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality From: Pavel Roskin To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Richard Farina , John Linville , wireless In-Reply-To: <20081126001942.GN5950@tesla> References: <492B2B74.7040404@gmail.com> <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla> <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv> <43e72e890811241526o1ea6ecf7ge05a2319d6ff3641@mail.gmail.com> <492B623E.5030202@gmail.com> <1227580299.32415.2.camel@dv> <20081126001942.GN5950@tesla> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:35:54 -0500 Message-Id: <1227659754.2556.11.camel@dv> (sfid-20081126_013605_909093_BC4E48ED) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This is documented here: > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Changingthedatabasefileformat I mean, I don't know how painful it can be. Perhaps it's better to anticipate some requirements earlier than to change them later. I think both "don't transmit" and "don't transmit unless permitted by the AP" could be useful in some jurisdictions. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin