Return-path: Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([70.167.247.36]:2502 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754169AbYKCCpX (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:45:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:44:55 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael+ath5k@stapelberg.de, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: fix detection of jumbo frames Message-ID: <20081103024455.GA11462@hash.localnet> (sfid-20081103_034528_834593_B2A64269) References: <1225652938-6244-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <43e72e890811021300o6bef49b0i515d0f72974cef00@mail.gmail.com> <20081102215218.GA6203@hash.localnet> <43e72e890811021433q61fe925bt5817f9e1ab0ba581@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <43e72e890811021433q61fe925bt5817f9e1ab0ba581@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 02:33:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Not sure I follow - these are incoming frames, which all had a status_0 > > of 0x1a40 (rs_more=0x1000 & length=0xa40). So hw rate index was zero > > on these for some reason, but in my testing the rate index of all other > > packets was something reasonable, e.g. 0x27. > > Interesting -- I will have to check on what this means. Yup, it would be good to handle these properly. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com