Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:36764 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464AbYKEWRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:17:25 -0500 Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Abhijeet Kolekar , Zhu Yi Message-Id: (sfid-20081105_231729_760712_964E8F9A) From: Marcel Holtmann To: Reinette Chatre In-Reply-To: <1225912449-26625-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association in 5Ghz band Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:17:22 +0100 References: <> <1225912449-26625-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Reinette, > A new wireless regulatory API has been added and > static definitions of regulatory alpha2 have been removed. > As a result of this 5Ghz channels have been disabled by default. > Patch takes care of this by setting the regulatory domain > by reading the EEPROM contents. > It uses regulatory_hint function to dynamically set the regulatory > channels. > > This patch is related to bug 11870 at bugzilla.kernel.org. With > correct regulatory information the number of channels to scan > will be correct and not zero as seen in that bug. > > This patch eliminates the need for wireless to be compiled with > CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY to get correct regulatory behavior with > iwlwifi. so this is still for 2.6.28, but for 2.6.29 and wireless-testing the API changed and we need a separate or different patch. John, Dave what is your take on pushing this to Linus this late in the merge window? I personally think we should do that. And if not, then change the Intel wireless Kconfig to select CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY by default at least. Regards Marcel