Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:60385 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752799AbYKXXVZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:21:25 -0500 Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality From: Pavel Roskin To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Richard Farina , John Linville , wireless In-Reply-To: <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla> References: <492B2B74.7040404@gmail.com> <20081124231204.GN6245@tesla> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:21:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1227568883.28878.15.camel@dv> (sfid-20081125_002129_460872_D604071C) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 15:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Your point about not being able to listen is a good one, and a patch to > update the the US in consideration of part 15 rules would be > appreciated. Keep in mind we have flags for such things: > > -Passive scan > -No-IBSS > > We should probably rename no-ibss to no-beaconing though as that is the > real meaning inention behind it. Maybe you mean no-transmit? I don't think seeing an AP transmitting on a wrong frequency is an excuse for doing the same. At least in some jurisdictions. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin