Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:33792 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbYKTCQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:16:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:00:54 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Ivo van Doorn , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Alan Jenkins Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3 Message-ID: <20081120020054.GB13464@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20081120_031618_924697_2CA0A401) References: <1225730537-2679-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200811031747.16326.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20081103170243.GB2417@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200811031820.41165.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20081112211530.GH2411@tuxdriver.com> <20081114001624.GA10002@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20081114001624.GA10002@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:16:24PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, John W. Linville wrote: > > Still, I don't see how they qualify for 2.6.28. How serious do you > > think this potential problem really is? > > It is not very grave, but it IS annoying... The only reason I don't > outright call it a regression, is that it was so broken before, it is just > broken in a different way without these patches. I'm sorry, but I would prefer not to bother with this for 2.6.28. Could you send versions intended for wireless-testing/2.6.29? Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.