Return-path: Received: from venema.h4ckr.net ([217.24.1.135]:35882 "EHLO venema.h4ckr.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751046AbYKXGPI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:15:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1205.94.79.146.217.1227505499.squirrel@webmail.madwifi.org> (sfid-20081124_071514_224762_60872498) In-Reply-To: <492A14A7.4040808@gmail.com> References: <492A14A7.4040808@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:44:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Fwd: please don't regress ath5k.h] From: "Michael Renzmann" To: "Richard Farina" Cc: "wireless" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. Richard Farina wrote: > I recently saw this additional comment added to wireless-testing.git and > it has me a bit concerned. I use this feature for a specific patch set > that I maintain and it would break it pretty bad to remove this. Just an idea: what prevents you to add a patch to that patchset that reenables the amount of code you require from the CHAN_DEBUG stuff should it be removed upstream? Bye, Mike