Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association
	in 5Ghz band
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240811060654w3c55bbc3ufb242a322ab5207e@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081106_155409_847949_E36B5F63)
References: <1225912449-26625-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com>
	 <B887D922-0154-4365-A44D-F284A5DF9386@linux.intel.com>
	 <20081106134950.GB14184@tuxdriver.com>
	 <1225982253.3619.233.camel@johannes.berg>
	 <1ba2fa240811060647x688f1efp1728e5f80dbb6b35@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1225983103.3619.242.camel@johannes.berg>
	 <1ba2fa240811060654w3c55bbc3ufb242a322ab5207e@mail.gmail.com>
	 (sfid-20081106_155409_847949_E36B5F63)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-J4ADk2tWvZafcAkozCTI"
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:58:00 +0100
Message-Id: <1225983480.3619.244.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20081106_155810_148212_5DBC81F7)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org


--=-J4ADk2tWvZafcAkozCTI
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:54 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>=
 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:47 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> >> The problem with missing A band is that this info was supplied to
> >> driver too late. after registration otherwise
> >> the iwlwifi dealt properly with missing band This was change in design
> >> that wasn't reflected in the driver.
> >>
> >> This can happen _regardless_ of the setting of old regulatory,
> >>
> >> With old regulatory the channel was known prior to registration
> >
> > Ah, you mean the driver wasn't updated (and previously not prepared) to
> > handle changing regulatory information?
>=20
> Yep.

That's fixed now though, right? At least I thought it was fixed by some
change but I can't seem to find it now.

johannes

--=-J4ADk2tWvZafcAkozCTI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook)
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=RMs/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-J4ADk2tWvZafcAkozCTI--