Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.230]:61124 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753167AbYLLWyD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:54:03 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1585499rvb.1 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:54:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <69e28c910812121454t7d765b27l918e2f6162bd3f08@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20081212_235408_633296_F7DF473B) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:54:03 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefanik_G=E1bor?=" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] cfg80211, mac80211: Introduce radiotap flags for finer userspace control of injection Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1229122225.3565.16.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <69e28c910812121432k1e8732bcma77e489d247ecdf4@mail.gmail.com> <1229121467.3565.2.camel@johannes.berg> <69e28c910812121440j6e010ac0j6e08cd6a53f58bcb@mail.gmail.com> <1229122225.3565.16.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 23:40 +0100, Stefanik G=E1bor wrote: > >> [...] > > Incidentally, as for the radiotap changes, I'm wondering whether the > flag really should be "no seqno" or should be "assign seqno" instead.= It > seems injection should be "as raw as possible" by default. But things > like that really need to be worked out with people from other systems= =2E > > johannes > Using an "assign seqno" flag would cause existing injectors that expect the kernel to do seq numbering for them to fail. This possibly includes hostap and penumbra. --=20 Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html