Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8620 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754317AbYLIUDp (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:03:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iwlwifi: change email contact information From: reinette chatre To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "Winkler, Tomas" In-Reply-To: <1228852251.19553.125.camel@violet.holtmann.net> References: <> <1228850941-16677-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1228850941-16677-2-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1228852251.19553.125.camel@violet.holtmann.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:04:46 -0800 Message-Id: <1228853086.2339.33.camel@rc-desk> (sfid-20081209_210351_486552_759F19D2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:50 -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > just double checking that "ilw" is intentional. It is kinda weird since > we prefix our driver with "iwl". It might be a little bit confusing. Yes - "ilw" is intentional (not a typo). > > Also the MODULE_AUTHOR tag should contain the maintainer information. At > least that is what the current consensus is. I know that the word author > is kinda misleading here. The author currently contains "Intel Corporation". There are a few people that fulfill the maintainer role so adding a person's name here will not work. Will this be acceptable: MODULE_AUTHOR("Copyright(c) 2003-2008 Intel Corporation ") Reinette