Return-path: Received: from sr04-01.mta.terra.com.br ([200.154.152.50]:36707 "EHLO sr04-01.mta.terra.com.br" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751528AbYL1Get (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:34:49 -0500 Received: from ponpeli.hst.terra.com.br (ponpeli.hst.terra.com.br [200.176.10.21]) by buniche.hst.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F47FE000134 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.42] (c906e0ca.virtua.com.br [201.6.224.202]) (authenticated user piterpk) by ponpeli.hst.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520A58000092 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <49571E29.8060204@unitednerds.org> (sfid-20081228_073510_818671_B265B765) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:35:21 -0200 From: Piter PUNK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: rt2500usb vs rt73usb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I have three rt2573 wireless devices: . TP-Link WN321G . D-Link DWA-110 . Built-in inside Intel ClassmatePC The D-Link device loads only the rt73usb module and works really fine. The other two loads rt73usb AND rt2500usb. The correct module for all is rt73usb. Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very annoying the additional modules loaded. Both modules are loaded because both handle 148f:2573 devices. Of course my universe is very small, only two devices, but... devices 148f:2573 that works with rt2500usb exists? Those devices can work with rt73usb? If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb? Thanks! Piter Punk