Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:21556 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094AbYLEJ7E (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:59:04 -0500 To: "Johannes Berg" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/5] mac80211: track master queue status References: <20081202200219.5507.83250.stgit@tikku> <20081202200426.5507.44042.stgit@tikku> <1228412076.5692.25.camel@johannes.berg> <87r64ni2yr.fsf@nokia.com> <1228470093.3970.8.camel@johannes.berg> From: Kalle Valo Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:57:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1228470093.3970.8.camel@johannes.berg> (ext Johannes Berg's message of "Fri\, 05 Dec 2008 10\:41\:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87ej0neyfx.fsf@nokia.com> (sfid-20081205_105909_833607_8A8D7A31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg writes: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 07:51 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Johannes Berg writes: >> >> > I wonder if we should optimise the spinlock here? >> >> That would be nice, but how to do that? > > I only meant to lock/unlock it just once instead of for each possible > queue. Ah, of course, stupid of me. I'll fix that. -- Kalle Valo