Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134]:52498 "EHLO mgw-mx09.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418AbYLEFw0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:52:26 -0500 To: "Johannes Berg" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/5] mac80211: track master queue status References: <20081202200219.5507.83250.stgit@tikku> <20081202200426.5507.44042.stgit@tikku> <1228412076.5692.25.camel@johannes.berg> From: Kalle Valo Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:51:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1228412076.5692.25.camel@johannes.berg> (ext Johannes Berg's message of "Thu\, 04 Dec 2008 18\:34\:35 +0100") Message-ID: <87r64ni2yr.fsf@nokia.com> (sfid-20081205_065229_578895_076E21BE) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg writes: > I wonder if we should optimise the spinlock here? That would be nice, but how to do that? > Also, I'd prefer to first add this with just a single DRIVER reason > first, and then add the PS patches that add and use the second reason. Yes, that's clean way to do it. I'll change it. > Other than that, it looks good to me, thanks! Thank you for all the help with this, much appreciated. I'll send v5 of my patches later this week. -- Kalle Valo