Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:23554 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754757AbYLVP5n (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:57:43 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:57:43 -0800 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:57:37 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "linville@tuxdriver.com" CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] ath9k: first series for regulatory cleanup Message-ID: <20081222155737.GF11083@tesla> (sfid-20081222_165746_830300_B55B22BB) References: <1229752522-1917-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <43e72e890812201110s626d98d9xb82b957c5530c955@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <43e72e890812201110s626d98d9xb82b957c5530c955@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:10:19AM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > wrote: > > > This should not have any major functional changes, its mostly > > cleanup stuff. I've tested HT20 on 2 GHz, will test 5 GHz tomorrow > > with the HT20/HT40 configurations but I figured I'll get this out > > today. If someone beats me to testing 5 GHz HT20/HT40 configs me > > please let me know. > > OK I've tested 5 GHz 802.11a, and 11NAHT40MINUS and found no > regressions. My AP didn't like to set itself to 11NAHT40PLUS but I > think that should be OK. John, I'll resubmit with the few changes pointed out by Tomas/Johannes and Jouni. Luis