Return-path: Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:39649 "EHLO mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383AbYLINOw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:14:52 -0500 From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: Fix HT channel selection Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:14:34 +0000 Cc: Mats Johannesson , Sujith , Johannes Berg , Jouni.Malinen@atheros.com References: <20081209135456.68778e51@loke.fish.not> In-Reply-To: <20081209135456.68778e51@loke.fish.not> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200812091314.34169.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20081209_141457_891863_044EE048) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > 13:30:16 : ath9k: (2452 MHz) -> (2457 MHz), cflags:500e0, chanwidth: 0 Why the useless brackets? And is it by intent that this uses frequencies and not channel numbers? I personally tend to be much more able to remember channels, but frequencies are more versatile.