Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:55391 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755771AbZAWTvY (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:51:24 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: Francesco Gringoli Subject: Re: integration of opensource firmware with b43 kernel driver Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:50:27 +0100 Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200901232033.28470.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200901232050.27952.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20090123_205132_728772_84AE66F7) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 23 January 2009 20:46:45 Francesco Gringoli wrote: > -- Is using the Broadcom names for the firmware the best course of > -- action? What if the opensource firmware files were named something > -- like "os-ucode5.fw", etc. and b43 were coded to check for those files > -- first? It would then fall back to the standard firmware if the > -- opensource version is not found. I answered to this question with this patch: http://bu3sch.de/patches/wireless-testing/20081227-1821/patches/008-b43-probe-open-fw.patch I am currently testing an updated version of the patch and I'll push it upstream tomorrow. -- Greetings, Michael.