Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:24021 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbZAYVd4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:33:56 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so3280922fgg.17 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:33:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090125212044.GA3592@hash.localnet> References: <1232914461-19607-1-git-send-email-tuliom@gmail.com> <20090125212044.GA3592@hash.localnet> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:33:54 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20090125_223401_478747_1D05E3D8) Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: support LED's on emachines E510 notebok From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho To: Bob Copeland Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Bob Copeland wrote: > Can you put the vendor id in order? The file is supposed to be > sorted by vendor id, then by device id in order to reduce merge > conflicts. Sorry... I haven't seen that. After the changes, should I submit them as a new mail? And to all lists? > With that change, feel free to add my: > > Acked-by: Bob Copeland Ok! Thanks, -- Tulio Magno